Tracker
AI laws and rules tracker 2026
AI laws, bills, executive orders, court rulings, regulator proposals and international agreements from our reporting, with their status and next deadlines, and the sourced story behind each one.
A proposal is not a law, an investigation is not a finding, and a fact sheet is not a working agreement. The status pill says how far each item has come.
Filter the list
Showing 8 entries of 50. Show all
October 2026
- Pennsylvania requires labels on misleading AI content in adsPennsylvania (Governor Josh Shapiro)Signed; applies Dec 21State lawCopy the link to this entry
Act 99 of 2026 bars ads that use AI-made or AI-changed images, video or sound to give a false picture of a product or service, unless they clearly say they contain AI content. Text-only content, parody and plain fiction are left out.
Penalty Civil fine of up to $3,000, plus legal fees and court costs, sought by the Attorney General or a district attorney
Pennsylvania law requires labels on misleading AI ads - Connecticut’s AI law: first duties in forceConnecticutIn force Oct 1State lawCopy the link to this entry
Employers must say whether mass layoffs relate to AI; frontier AI developers may not retaliate against staff who report catastrophic risks; big AI image, audio and video tools get subscription and provenance rules.
Next step Companion chatbot rules on January 1, 2027
Connecticut’s AI rules on layoffs and whistleblowers start
September 2026
- California’s No Robo Bosses Act (SB 947) signedCaliforniaSigned; applies July 1, 2027State lawCopy the link to this entry
Employers may not discipline or fire workers based solely on an automated decision system. A human must corroborate decisions that rely mainly on one, and workers get written notice.
Penalty $500 per violation; enforced by the Labor Commissioner and prosecutors
California bars firing or disciplining workers by AI alone - Kill switch and outside checks for every AI system in New York CityNew York City CouncilProposedCity billCopy the link to this entry
The main bill would make it unlawful to sell or deploy an AI system in the city without third-party validation and a human kill switch, with fines of $25,000 per violation.
Next step Hearing on October 5
New York City proposes a kill switch for every AI system - Ratepayer Protection Act: large data centres and grid costsUS House of RepresentativesPassed the House 417–3Federal billCopy the link to this entry
Asks state regulators to consider special rules for sites above 100 megawatts. It does not set one national price.
US House says huge data centres should pay their grid costs - Independent AI checks and a state list of auditorsCaliforniaSignedState lawCopy the link to this entry
Two laws create a framework for independent checks of AI systems and a state list of auditors.
California signed rules for independent AI checks - Ban on superintelligent AI and a pause on advanced AIBernie Sanders and Greg CasarAnnouncedFederal billCopy the link to this entry
A plan for a temporary pause on advanced AI and a permanent ban on superintelligence. The full legal details are not yet clear.
US lawmakers want to ban superintelligent AI
How this tracker works
An entry appears when one of our stories covers a law, a bill, an executive order, a court ruling, a regulator’s move or an international agreement on AI. The date is the one the story gives; when a story gives none, it is the story’s own date. We add entries with each edition and correct them under the story when a fact changes.
Reusing this list: you may quote it with a link to this page. Facts belong to the sources each story cites.