Archive
Every story we have published, newest first. Search by company, product, or idea, or filter by topic.
A letter is not a law.
The members asked Speaker Mike Johnson to keep the House in Washington until it advances bipartisan AI rules. They pointed to existing bills, but leaders had not promised a vote when the letter became public.
A new package requires stronger chatbot safeguards, bans some addictive feed features for users under 16, and adds child privacy rules. The next test is whether regulators can make the rules work in real products.
An investigation is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Reports say the Justice Department is studying a licensing deal that moved Groq leaders to Nvidia without buying the company. Nvidia’s accounts show $17 billion in payments and obligations tied to the agreement.
Now the auditors need to earn trust.
Two new laws create a framework for independent checks and a state list of AI auditors. The rules can improve accountability if auditors stay independent and publish useful evidence.
More than 25 ministers and representatives backed eight priorities for AI in education. They call for teacher control, age-aware safeguards, data rights, and systems that help students think.
The public evidence is still limited.
China called the US accusations unfair and asked for cooperation. The US advisory gives technical warning signs, but the named companies have not been judged by a court.
Access is only the first test.
The agreement covers nearly 100,000 educators and more than 1.1 million students. Residents can also use free career courses through state job centers.
A European expert group says policy should cover the full path from brain data to AI models and later uses. Its statement is advice, not a new law.
Both companies had supported the papers’ AI projects.
The Seattle Times and Newsday say OpenAI and Microsoft copied paid articles without permission. A court must now decide if the companies broke copyright law.
First, they must define it.
Bernie Sanders and Greg Casar announced a plan for a temporary pause on advanced AI and a permanent ban on superintelligence. The full legal details are not yet clear.
The Justice Department says training AI on copyrighted work can be fair use. This may influence the case, but the judge still makes the legal decision.
Regulators want AI companies to report clear facts about computing power, energy use, tests, and serious problems. These facts are easier to check than broad promises.